Listen
Requirements gathering
4 weeks
How G-Tech Solutions helped an Australian construction group understand its business end to end, agree a digital transformation roadmap, and prove the first solutions in a live pilot, without forcing a product onto the business.
Client Partner
Confidential Tier-1 Contractor ($450M+ Pipeline)
Engagement Scope
Diagnostics → Roadmap → Architecture → 5 Pilots
Enterprise Stack
Zero Discard: Harmonized Legacy Repositories
Deployment Model
Field Shadowing + Dedicated Engineering Pod
Data trapped in disparate silos, manual handoffs, and duplicate human effort.
Synchronized data exchange with unified governance and automated intelligence.
Source of Truth
ERP
Direct API Hook
Inbox Sync
Outlook
Smart Parsing
Active Comms
Slack
Bot Webhooks
Orchestration Backbone
Intelligent Workflow Layer
Central Document Repo
SharePoint
Semantic Index & Search
General Ledger & AP
Xero
3-Way Automated PO Matching
100%
Client IP Ownership
0 Lock-In
Native APIs Only
Single Pane
Unified Visibility
Figure 1 The same strong systems, connected by a strategy built around the business
Auto-Layout: Horizontal / Fill container · Tokens: Executive Precision
At a Glance
8
weeks to an agreed strategy and technical plan
4
decision gates kept the owner in control
5
solution paths considered not just AI
01 — The Challenge
The client already ran capable platforms for projects, email, documents, messaging and finance. The problem wasn't the software. It was everything in between.
Project and operational records lived in the ERP, approvals in Outlook, decisions in Slack, signed documents in SharePoint and the numbers in Xero. Finding the latest approved subcontract, checking an invoice against its purchase order, or pulling together the weekly report meant searching several systems by hand and relying on the few people who knew where everything was. The owners had been pitched technology before. What they wanted was different: a partner who would take the time to understand the whole business, agree a direction with them, and only then recommend what genuinely fits, even if the answer wasn’t AI.
The owners' brief, in summary
People hunted through folders, inboxes and chat for evidence.
Figures were re-keyed and re-checked across systems.
Approvals sat in email with no central status.
Finding information depended on who you asked.
02 — Our Approach
We ran the engagement as four separately priced stages. The first two decided the direction; the last two delivered it. At the end of each, the business owner reviewed the outputs and gave the go ahead, or not.
Listen
4 weeks
Decide
2 weeks
Design
2 weeks
Prove
Strategy-led
03 — Requirements
We worked alongside leadership, project managers, finance, operations, compliance, and IT on-site and online to see the handoffs that process maps miss.
Current-State Intelligence
What We Delivered
How the business works today, function by function.
Key workflows, handoffs, and approval paths made visible.
Data sources, dependencies, and readiness findings.
Pain points scored against value, effort, and risk.
04 — Strategy & Roadmap
Every opportunity was matched to the option that genuinely fitted. Value, readiness, risk, and effort shaped the roadmap.
Priority Matrix
Value × readiness
05 — Solution Design
Before a line was built, we translated the agreed strategy into business flows, integrations, data rules, security controls, and acceptance criteria.
Design gate passed
Owner approved
Design Workflow
Solution Blueprint
Quality Built In
of pilot use cases had acceptance criteria before build
Approved Outputs
06 — Pilot
Each use case was built, system tested, and accepted by the client's own users before it reached the pilot group.
Step 01
Build
Step 02
System test
Step 03
User acceptance
Step 04
Go live
Step 05
Review
Find the latest approved subcontract
SharePoint · ERP
Match invoice to purchase order
ERP · Xero
Compare invoice with variations
ERP · Outlook
Retrieve current project documentation
ERP · SharePoint
Weekly project summary
ERP · Slack
07 — Staying in Control
At every gate, we presented the evidence and our recommendation. The owner chose the next move—without lock-in, sunk-cost pressure, or a predetermined product.
Governance Model
4 independent gates
Requirements gathering
Present → review → decide
Strategy & roadmap
Present → review → decide
Solution architecture
Present → review → decide
Live pilot
Present → review → decide
Business owner
Decision authority retained
08 — The Outcome
The business now has a practical transformation system: shared evidence, agreed priorities, a tested technical direction, and the confidence to scale deliberately.
A shared picture of how the business works today
A long-term roadmap owned by the business
A signed-off design for priority initiatives
Pilot use cases tested by the people doing the work
i
We studied the work before recommending technology.
ii
Process, automation, integration, AI, or systems—only where they fit.
iii
Real users validated the pilot before wider investment.
Why UsG-Tech Solutions combines AI development with extensive experience in custom software, web applications, mobile applications, APIs, CRM, ERP, cloud systems and business automation. This allows us to do more than build an isolated AI feature. We can connect the solution with the systems your employees and customers already use.
Custom solutions designed specifically around your unique business workflows.
A highly dedicated AI development team focused on modern intelligent architecture.
Advanced AI and custom software development capabilities aligned under one roof.
Seamless integration with existing enterprise and legacy business systems.

Practical, real-world solutions directly focused on operational outcomes.
Robust and scalable architecture engineered for future enterprise expansion.
Transparent project communication, ongoing support, and active optimisation.
Deep Australian business landscape and industry context understanding.